What operations leaders ask us
Reasonable objections, answered plainly.
These are the questions we hear in the first meeting with VPs of Manufacturing, plant and brewery directors, and continuous improvement leads.
01
Our lines already run well enough.
Then the assessment costs you 60 minutes and confirms it. In our experience, lines with strong OEE on paper still carry five to fifteen points of recoverable loss in short stops that are never coded correctly. The measurement is the point.
02
This sounds like a long transformation project.
It is not. The first line is a contained project. We assess, model, deploy on edge hardware beside the machines, and train the model on your data. You get a running result on one line before committing to a rollout.
03
We have too many different OEMs and machine types.
That is the normal starting condition in any bottling hall and the reason OPC UA exists. Estates described as a jungle of different technologies have moved from five data points per machine to hundreds using a companion specification approach. Mixed vendors are a scope question, not a blocker.
04
We are not sure how to connect legacy equipment.
Retrofit is standard practice. Where a machine cannot expose data natively, we add sensors and IoT gateways and bring it into the same communication layer as new equipment. Brownfield lines are where most of the value sits.
05
We already collect performance data.
Collecting is not controlling. Most bottlers and brewers have OEE reporting that explains yesterday. The difference here is a closed loop that acts on the line while the shift is still running.
06
AI and edge use cases feel experimental.
This one is not. The Speed Management Controller is deployed in production at a global manufacturer and is being rolled out across further sites. It is a validated edge application with published results, not a proof of concept.
07
Integration across OT and IT feels complex.
It is, and that is precisely what we do. Coca-Cola HBC ran their OT/IT convergence program with IndX across a 62-plant estate, starting with one pilot plant covering the majority of their vendor ecosystem, then scaling by criticality. Governance first, then technology.